Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

All-inside vs. conventional method in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Su Djie To Rante ,
  • Asep Santoso ,
  • Tangkas Sibarani ,
  • Dwikora Novembri Utomo ,

Abstract

Introduction: Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was prevalent among sports, with a female predominance. If not treated properly, ACL deficiency knee can cause significant morbidity and long-term impairment. The most often utilized reconstructive methods in modern clinical practice were conventional and all-inside treatments. This study compared all-inside and conventional ACL reconstruction methods through systematic review and meta-analysis.

Method: The searching protocol was carried out using several databases, such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, to identify relevant topics in May 2022. This study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2020 (PRISMA) guidelines.

Result: There were 17 studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All of the reviewed studies were written in English. Most of the included studies were carried out in Europe. Theafollowaup duration range from 3amonthsato 4ayears. The total participants were 2329 patients with ACL reconstructions. There was a significant difference between groups in the overall analysis, with the all-inside technique having higher Lysholm score outcomes than the conventional technique (MD = 1.87; 95% CI = 0.41–3.33; p < 0.05)

Conclusion: All-inside technique has higher Lysohlm score outcome than the conventional technique. There is no significant difference in pain and IKDC score between both groups.

Section

References

  1. Marieswaran M, Jain I, Garg B, Sharma V, Kalyanasundaram D. A Review on Biomechanics of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Materials for Reconstruction. Appl bionics Biomech. 2018;2018(May 13):1–14.
  2. Bhimani R, Shahriarirad R, Ranjbar K, Erfani A, Ashkani-Esfahani S. Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):1–19.
  3. Singh N. International Epidemiology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries. Orthop Res Online J. 2018;3(3):1–4.
  4. Zbrojkiewicz D, Vertullo C, Grayson JE. Increasing rates of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young Australians, 2000-2015. Med J Aust. 2018;208(8):354–8.
  5. Chung KS, Kim JH, Kong DH, Park I, Kim JG, Ha JK. An Increasing Trend in the Number of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Korea: A Nationwide Epidemiologic Study. Clin Orthop Surg. 2021;13:1–7.
  6. Saputro NE. Hubungan olahraga dengan derajat cedera anterior cruciatum ligament pada kelompok usia 10-26 Tahun. Universitas Trisakti; 2019.
  7. Filbay SR, Grindem H. Evidence-based recommendations for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019;33(1):33–47.
  8. Ashraf Y, Senevirathna SR, Ashraf T. Conventional versus "all-inside" anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial comparing hamstring strength and functional outcome. Bone Jt Open. 2020;1(11):706–8.
  9. Kouloumentas P, Kavroudakis E, Charalampidis E, Kavroudakis D, Triantafyllopoulos GK. Superior knee flexor strength at 2 years with all-inside short-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs a conventional hamstring technique. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(11):3592–8.
  10. Lubowitz JH. All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Link: Graft Preparation Technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2012;1(2):e165–8.
  11. Kim JG, Kang KT, Wang JH. Biomechanical difference between conventional transtibial single-bundle and anatomical transportal double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three-dimensional finite element model analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(8).
  12. Zeng C, Lei G, Gao S, Luo W. Methods and devices for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun;2018(6):CD010730.
  13. Guglielmetti LGB, Cury R de PL, de Oliveira VM, de Camargo OPA, Severino NR, Fucs PM de MB. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a new cortical suspension device for femoral fixation with transtibial and transportal techniques. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:110.
  14. Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffman T, Mulrow C. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
  15. Baldassarri M, Perazzo L, Ghinelli D, Ricciarelli M, Pilla F, Buda R. Return to Sport after ACL Surgery: A Comparison between Two Different Reconstructive Techniques. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(6):513–8.
  16. Desai VS, Anderson GR, Wu IT, Levy BA, Dahm DL, Camp CL, et al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft: A Matched Cohort Comparison of the All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques. Orthop J Sport Med. 2019;7(1):1–7.
  17. Goyal T, Das L, Paul S, Choudhury AK, Sethy SS. Outcomes of retro-drilled all-inside tibial tunnel vs complete tibial tunnel techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32(3):523–32.
  18. Mayr R, Smekal V, Koidl C, Coppola C, Eichinger M, Rudisch A, et al. ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(4):1036–44.
  19. Benea H, d'Astorg H, Klouche S, Bauer T, Tomoaia G, Hardy P. Pain evaluation after all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and short term functional results of a prospective randomized study. Knee. 2014;21(1):102–6.
  20. Cournapeau J, Klouche S, Hardy P. Material costs of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons by two different techniques. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(2):196–201.
  21. Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, Löfgren AC, Bredenberg M, Westman I, et al. A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B. 2001;83(3):348–54.
  22. Lubowitz JH, Schwartzberg R, Smith P. Randomized controlled trial comparing all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a full tibial tunnel. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc North Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2013 Jul;29(7):1195–200.
  23. Pautasso A, Capella M, Barberis L, Drocco L, Giai Via R, Bistolfi A, et al. All-inside technique in ACL reconstruction: mid-term clinical outcomes and comparison with AM technique (Hamstrings and BpTB grafts). Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;31(3):465–72.
  24. Volpi P, Bait C, Cervellin M, Denti M, Prospero E, Morenghi E, et al. No difference at two years between all inside transtibial technique and traditional transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014;4(1):95–9.
  25. Monaco E, Fabbri M, Redler A, Gaj E, De Carli A, Argento G, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(8):2577–84.
  26. Russu OM, Ciorcila E, Feier AM, Fleaca R, Zuh SG, Ioanovici AC, et al. Early outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Full Tibial tunnel technique compared to all-inside technique. Rev Chim. 2018;69(12):3753–5.
  27. Sahu DSK, Ganesh DA. All-inside technique versus conventional Transportal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective study. Int J Orthop Sci. 2020;6(1):39–44.
  28. Greif DN, Shallop BJ, Allegra PR, Cade WH, Minesinger KE, Luxenburg D, et al. A Comparison of Two-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Clinical Outcomes Using All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Femoral/Tibial Cortical Suspensory Fixation Versus Tibial Interference Screw Fixation. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2022;38(3):881–91.
  29. Lefevre N, Servien E, Colombet P, Cournapeau J, Dalmay F, Lutz C, et al. French prospective multicenter comparative assessment of ambulatory surgery feasibility in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(8):S257–63.
  30. Mayr R, Smekal V, Koidl C, Coppola C, Fritz J, Rudisch A, et al. Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with aperture screw fixation or all-inside reconstruction with suspensory cortical button fixation: Volumetric measurements on CT and MRI scans. Knee. 2017;24(5):1047–54.
  31. Fu CW, Chen WC, Lu YC. Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jul;21(1):445.
  32. Connaughton AJ, Geeslin AG, Uggen CW. All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques? J Orthop. 2017 Jun;14(2):241–6.
  33. van Meer BL, Meuffels DE, Reijman M. A Comparison of the Standardized Rating Forms for Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured or Reconstructed Patients. Second Edi. The Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Reconstruction and Basic Science: Second Edition. Elsevier; 2018. 484-489.e2 p.
  34. Yasen SK, Borton ZM, Eyre-Brook AI, Palmer HC, Cotterill ST, Risebury MJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of anatomic, all-inside, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Knee. 2017;24(1):55–62.

How to Cite

Rante, S. D. T., Santoso, A. ., Sibarani, T. ., & Utomo, D. N. . (2022). All-inside vs. conventional method in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Indonesia Journal of Biomedical Science, 16(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.15562/ijbs.v16i2.398

HTML
67

Total
48

Share

Search Panel